Friday, February 12, 2021

Just How Overextended Is The US Stockmarket?

How overextended is the stock market? Here's a visual aid - Chart 1.

From 2009 to the present S&P 500 has been in a seminal bull market producing a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16%; as of today it is at an all time high of 3915. Yes, there have been a couple of sharp corrections, but no extended bear market. How does this performance compare with long term returns? 

 

  Chart 1

Firstly, the 60 year average CAGR is 7.27%, while since 1975 it has been 9.73%.

To give us perspective, I have annotated the S&P chart with levels where the index would be today if CAGR since 2009 was at various CAGRs:  7.27%, 10%, 12% and 14%.  In other words, a reversal to a 10% return would place S&P at 2071 - even a 14% return (almost double the long term average) would place it at 3180.  If it were to return to its average since 1975 (10%) it would be at 2071.

In time terms, S&P would have to stay at its present level of 3910 until 2027 to revert to 10% CAGR   or 2033 to revert to its long term of 7.27%.

Let's do another, very short term CAGR calculation: from its bottom on March 2020 to today the CAGR is 91%. Even if we totally ignore last year's pullback and take the previous high of 3400 points as a starting point, today's level still produces a CAGR of 15% !

So, yes, the market is overextended and due for a pullback and/or a pause of some years.

From yet another perspective, S&P has outperformed European markets by a very large margin - Chart 2.  

Chart 2

There are many other fundamental metrics which show a market that has run way ahead of itself: forward P/Es, total market capitalization to GDP, dividend yield, etc.  A student of crowd psychology, however, would be far more interested in this: retail investors currently make up 25% of the market's activity versus just 10% in 2019.

3 comments:

  1. The TINA (there is no alternative) effect is totally at play: "Today, it is often used by investors to explain a less-than-ideal portfolio allocation, usually of stocks, because other asset classes offer even worse returns. This situation and the subsequent decisions of investors can lead to the "TINA Effect" whereby stocks rise only because investors have no viable alternative."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Remember my post from years past about the Trading Sardine? This is what's going on right now :)

      Delete