Thursday, December 29, 2022

Of Eggs, Baskets And Apple Eggnog

 When it comes to investing there are two schools of thought:

  • Don't put all of your eggs in one basket
  • Put all your eggs in one basket and watch it very, very carefully
In decades past Warren Buffett, the world's most prominent investor, followed the first rule choosing to invest in a largish number of carefully selected smaller companies; many of them were not even listed on any exchange.  But as assets at Berkshire Hathaway expanded exponentially it became impossible to invest so much capital without taking large, strategic positions in huge listed companies.  In effect, Mr. Buffett now follows the second rule and does so in a very big way, indeed.

Another of Mr. Buffett's rules was that he never invested in anything that we could not understand or appreciate fully (his investment in See's candy is legend).  This rule has also now been tossed out.

To the point: Berkshire's largest position, at an astonishing 37% of its portfolio, is Apple. Another 11% is invested in Bank of America and 10% in Chevron.  At 58% it's one hell of a large basket.  Furthermore, if any one person claims to truly understand what goes on in Apple... or inside a huge commercial/investment bank... good luck to him/her (another 12% is invested in Coca Cola and Kraft Heinz combined - that's more along his old style).

So, to a very large extent Berkshire Hathaway, and by direct inference Mr. Buffet's future legacy, has now  become hostage to Apple.   It's the largest company in the world by market cap: $2 trillion.. and looking at its chart I get a very, very queasy feeling.  It feels as if Apple is the only thing keeping S&P 500 from crapping out (ok, Microsoft is helping, too).


I'm afraid Mr. Buffett is going to end up with lots of broken eggs... and lots of Apple-flavored eggnog for the New Year.  

6 comments:

  1. now that is what a prediction should be... "I am predicting Buffet is going to lose a lot of money... and I am fixing a time line, one year.." way to go Hell!!!!!!! Here is hoping you are right. =)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have admired Mr. Buffett for decades. Not only his investment style, but also his personal life have been a beacon for me. Then, he started changing. I cannot blame him, of course - what's the point of being a billionaire if you still live in an old house in Omaha and drive a 1970s Chevy? And what's the point of spending all of your remaining life on this Earth poring through thousands of 10-Ks to find than one gem that would make you even more millions?

    He has nothing more to prove and nothing more to gain, so at some point (and I do remember how it all started, back in the Shearson/Salomon era) he probably said... screw it man, live a little :)

    IMHO it is a mistake to bet so much on a single horse - any one horse - inside such a large portfolio. It also explains why Apple shares have not really joined the rest of the tech sector down - there is a huge anchor investor. For now.

    Again IMHO, Apple seems to have hit a dry spell innovation wise. Unless they have something very new well hidden, they are increasingly challenged by the likes of China's Xiaomi. Same stuff at less than half the price. Even their stores are better...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. think Buffet is betting on Apple's Ecosystem rather than its innovation... which I agree with you, is drying up... but to be honest, so is Google's and others...

      Is Apple's ecosystem vulnerable?... yes and no... it is more vulnerable than Microsoft's, which can publish bad products for 20 years with no consequences... but from the mid-term view, it seems quite robust... long term, it seems less robust...

      short term, which Hell is focusing on, I agree, Apple is vulnerable ....

      Delete
    2. btw, someone that shares your opinion of Buffet.

      Chicken.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kArJgaTRPYU

      Delete
    3. By H.
      Thanks AKOC! I really do believe that WB is completely ignoring the geopolitical risk. TSMC is “cheap” for a very good reason: risk-adjusted for China’s possible takeover of Taiwan, it may even be very expensive.
      There is a very serious warning sign: the US government is going all-in in promoting domestic chip manufacturing.

      Delete