View everything that has happened so far in the global economy as The Crisis, Part One. What is still to come is Part Two - and it's going to be worse. Why? Because we are going to get slammed with the effects of rapidly rising unemployment where it hurts most: consumption makes up 70% of GDP. No job, no spending.
Look at the chart below (click to enlarge): employment (blue line) is dropping at the fastest rate in 60 years. Meanwhile, total population is still rising at over 1% per year.
And here's the government's increasingly pressing Keynesian dilemma: borrowing trillions to salvage the financial sector from its own perfidy makes it all that harder to go on a public spending program to boost jobs and incomes in a counter-cyclical fashion.
But isn't all this new "bail-out money" created by the Fed and Treasury going to eventually find itself in the pockets of Mr. and Mrs. Average Joe? No, it won't - and AIG is the perfect example why: the $182.5 billion in public money it received to cover its CDS-related losses was immediately recycled back into the Wall Street trough. Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, et. al. are not exactly hurting and in no way contributing to balanced income re-distribution. Even if Wall Street bonuses are "slashed" by 50% (and they most certainly aren't) it still means a huge chasm in income disparity.
Let's see things for what they are, right now:
- Until 2008 tens of millions of American Average families supplemented their increasingly insufficient wages and salaries by borrowing. They didn't do so to buy into a Rich and Famous lifestyle, but to continue the American Dream middle class existence they inherited from their parents. A modest house, a nice car, college, medical care, a bit of vacation. This package, unfortunately, became unaffordable as real incomes stagnated; so household debt soared, instead.
- The debt bubble blew out of all proportion and finally burst. All that so-called innovative finance did with its inumerable alphabet derivative contraptions was to mask reality and keep the party going for just a bit longer.
- Households cannot borrow as before and cannot resume consuming at their previous pace. Thus, GDP will continue to drop until it gets in balance with the carrying capacity of earned incomes.
- Since the government is not currently providing Keynesian fiscal stimulus to the real economy this process will be drawn out and unemployment will continue to rise.
- Higher unemployment will quickly hit even those sectors of the economy that have - so far - mostly escaped serious damage: consumer staples, discount retailers, healthcare, etc. For example, look at the huge overperformance of McDonalds shares (MCD) vs. banks (BKX).
Bottom line: our previous economic "growth" was a debt-induced mirage and has now disappeared. Current global economic policy measures are aimed almost 100% at salvaging the bankrupt and discredited (literally) financial sector. This will prove a huge and costly policy mistake that will quickly backfire as the real economy continues to adjust downward to its "natural", lower debt state.
Consumer Confidence addendum (April 29, 2009)
The Conference Board yesterday announced that its reading of consumer confidence for the month of April jumped a very significant 13.2 points, from 26 to 39.2. On the face of it, this sounds very encouraging - until we dig a little deeper: the rise was almost entirely due to a jump in the Expectations Index, up almost 20 points. The Present Situation Index was almost unchanged, as were other sub-indexes that measure current business conditions and job prospects. Hope dies last?
As I said in the previous post [scroll down, see point (b)] we are in the midst of a manufactured feedback loop that is aiming to boost peoples' morale. The stockmarket's recent performance is a big factor in all of this, no doubt. An entire generation of Americans (and plenty of others, too..) has grown up with the religious belief that green "up" arrows on the Dow scrolling below their CNBC screen is - somehow - a good thing for them, even if they own zero stocks and bonds.
For them, I suggest they should instead look at this chart, below: continued claims for unemployment insurance as a percent of the civilian labor force, i.e. the real economy, right now. Unfortunately, it doesn't look good; if we reach the 5% level of 1975, then we are looking at an additional 2 million continuing benefit claimants, on top of the record 6.1 million currently.
And if things get significantly uglier (remember, "worst crisis since 1929"?), say to the tune of 8%, then we will have to deal with 12.5 million people claiming unemployment benefits. Truly ugly.
So, if the real economy doesn't turn around in the current quarter there will be hell to pay; from a psychological perspective alone, dashed expectations are very powerful negative motivators that will induce people to really go into their shells.
And that's when the Crisis will go into its most virulent, Part Two phase. Just in time for the swine...
Our money backed by debt monetary system required exponential debt growth. Our energy use is exponentially growing as is global population. The age of permagrowth is or nearly is over. The status quo dies hard. All the attempts so far are simply a futile effort to revive a system that is doomed to fail. Their Herculean efforts will only delay its demise. This has been the theme of your blog.
The more interesting questions at this time are what are some solutions to the above problems.
I would guess that solutions are actually not difficult to come by: steady-state economics, renewable energy, mass recycling and reuse, less throw-away, sustainability, greenback, bla bla bla (there are variations, but not lack of solutions)
For me, the interesting question is how all this will unfold? The transition... Will it be orderly or chaotic?
Will the next years be ones of rational transition, careful policies based on the idea that debt and increasing consumption of resources is unsustainable or will it be through trying to maintain the current status-quo ensuing an hard-landing with suffering maybe war, etc?
Hell, Beautiful writing here:...(government)borrowing trillions to salvage the financial sector from its own perfidy...ReplyDelete
Maybe we can regulate that the financial sector execs have to buy 40" TVs for all 30 rooms, have to buy 40 Fords instead of 2 Bentleys, and 1,000 pairs of sneakers for their kids to make up the lack of consumer purchases.
" that solutions are actually not difficult to come by: steady-state economics, renewable energy, mass recycling and reuse, less throw-away, sustainability, greenback, "
These solutions are still costly and will result in money extracted from consumer spending and pressure employment and production in consumer related sectors. This is not necessarily a bad long run shift away from consummables to sustainable production but to manage it we need programs to pick up the economic slack and the unemployment created. If not it will significantly exacerabte the downturn.
A "work to live" program where anyone who needs welfaf]re of any type, except those physically unable, can find government sponsored work sort of like the WPA would need to be implemented. It must provide a living wage, day care, health care and minimum benefits. It could use the person's skills where possible but absent that community lanscaping, , cleanup, road repair, forest management are a small sample of the types of programs that could be created where other opportunities were lacking. Call it socialism - - right on! How muchh more crisis it will take before the elites are weakened enough to allow for the wide acceptance it probably already has to manifest itself for all to see? We shall have to wait to find that one out.
P.S. The 7:01 Anonymous post is not from me but echos what I have said several times. I am not going to repeat it here though, so if you see it in the future again someone else will have come to this same conclusion. I might suggest that if you have such sentiments posting at least a moniker would help us know that they are not all from the same person.
Great post and spot on. It will get much worse and there is no way for an orderly transition, it will be very ugly, too much debt involved.ReplyDelete
The only question now is one of timing but I do believe it will be within months and not in a year or 2.
What sucks is that all those decades of easy money which people thought was normal induced people into a false sense of complacency.ReplyDelete
Instead of managing fancy restaurants or being real estate agents they could have been studying the sciences or engineering and would have laid the foundation for innovation and real economic growth.
This is misallocation of resources on a massive, gargantuan, global scale.
Well, I for one figured this one out years ago, courtesy of J.K. Galbraith.ReplyDelete
I will turn things around to suggest that this is NOT in any way a crisis, as this situation was a given, as soon as we started implementing automatisation with the industrial revolution.
It is false to imagine that this is a crisis, in the same way as it is also false to imagine that solutions are not already being worked on at an individual, not at a governmental or societal level, but then neoliberalism has ensured the atomisation of our society also, with the resulting breakdown of the concept of the "common good".
Even OUR reactions on this blog, I mean the reactions of many of the regulars on this blog reflect the tremendous difficulty we have contemplating the ramifications, and the implications of the impending collapse of our monetary systems.
But I will go further.
Since I have said elsewhere that the monetary system is just ONE of our symbolic systems, I should also add that ALL of our symbolic systems are in the red (lol...) because we are having troubles with our symbols. THEY are bankrupt too.
And all the greenbacks in the world won't take care of that...
The solution is simple:ReplyDelete
Create a proper social security net for all Americans on par with what "the greatest generation" had, then get out of way.
Obama is on the right path but congress GOP and DEMs are blocking the way.
Universal Health Care, drastically downsize the Pentagon and CIA.
Re-regulate banking back to banking as a service industry to the main economy and not the economy.
Re-afirm the separation of church and state.
Make property taxes illegal across the country so that we can once again have true property ownership.
Get rid of the federal reserve and hanve congress print money as the founding fathers intended. Cancel the US taxpayer's trillions in debt to the federal reserve as it is illegal.
Put Hank Paulson, GW Bush, and Dick Cheney in jail.
Hell, this inability to use more and more debt to further enable consumers to drive the GDP is why I keep posting that Debt Unwind is rendering our GDP model moribund. The evidence is mounting that the model had only a 25-yr lifespan and will be as hard to re-animate as would be 'the dead'.ReplyDelete
Worse, this put us in a Structural Economic Transformation on par with the 1973-1982/84 wrenching transformation we undertook when we were 1/3rd smaller in population (1973=200 Million). Using the Jan 1973 onset of the S&P Crash as the beginning, we underwent 9 years of wrenching economic pain, plus 2 additional years before sustained job growth appeared in 1984. By then, 1984, we had jettisoned our manufacturing based along with numerous mgf-related livelihoods in favor of a 25-yr experiment with the ‘Service Economy’ and its attended 'Creative Class' and Knowledge Workers' who, sadly, face 21st century downward-pulling tidal forces on wage growth due to globalization. Therefore they require debt rather than wage growth to 'make ends meet'...and Debt Unwind is limiting that option.
Debt Unwind will eventually deposit us (via an ‘L’-shaped DESCENT, not recovery), with us kicking & screaming the entire way, somewhere on the bumpy floor of an economic crater, far away from that old model of GDP 70% driven by debt-enabled consumer spending.
Ergo, we’re in an involuntary Structural Change to our economy...without any hands (yet)directing the trajectory of the irrepressible change.
I love some of these comments ... "Obama is on the right path but ... DEMS are blocking the way ..."ReplyDelete
and yes, we can "fix" it with universal health coverage ... hahahahahahahaah
too good. thanks for that!
Unemployment in Germany was 30% when Hitler rose to power. Right now, we're at 15-20% real numbers (not the crap that drops you from the tally after 6 months).ReplyDelete
Hence in 10 more percent we will have large numbers of unemployed youths. No jobs, no credit cards or ipods no Tijuana spring break.
You guess what will happen.
Most people have no money, in fact most people have negative money (debt) so crisis #2 will help most people.ReplyDelete
Crisis #2 will hopefully transfer back to the middle class trillions in wealth stolen by the Bush mafia.
You are correct, the battle is between Obama and the criminals in Washington and Wall-Street.ReplyDelete
If Obama does not win then there may actually be a revolution in America and Washington plus Wall Street is taken back through force.
Universal Health Coverage puts a "floor" under consumer cofidence so they are no in a constant panic of losing thier life savings do to some minor surgery.ReplyDelete
America truely is a backwards slave state, it is really crazy how anyone live in America if you are making less the say 800K per year.
I would be on the first train out to a civilized country if was not for the $$ that I am stashing away.
When the $$ dries up, then I'm on the first plane out of America back to a civilized country. One where I can walk down the street without fear of some redneck, mexican, niggar or other warped American killing me.
No one is commenting on the effect ultra-low interest rates are having on consumer savings. Instead, all the focus is on debtor relief and credit. It is impossible for conservative investors to spend if their investment income is non-existent.ReplyDelete
Nevertheless, the reality of Bernanke's experiment will become clear. Just as early users of x-rays were enthusiastic, those who were exposed to the rays soon found the ghastly side of them. So too with bloating the Fed's balance sheet to re-inflate the bubble. The end result will be more devastating then the masters of the universe imagined.
I couldn't agree more with you SS. Alas we do have to admit that our loathing of such characterizations is just as flawed/just as zero sum as this is to us.ReplyDelete
As Yoyomo rightfully points out, "everyone behaving a little better" is an elitest solution.
We can't have it both ways either.
Either we expand the boundaries of the system we live in, or accept the reality that our view is just as ugly to some as this is to us.
Civility is not elitist.ReplyDelete
Every serious and responsible major blogger I read has accepted responsibility for deleting needlessly offensive reader posts:ReplyDelete
Mish, Calculated Risk, The Big Picture. Yves Smith recently reminded her readers that she is escalating comment deletions and bans as part of her accountability to the quality of her blog.
I hope you follow suit.
Again, if Anonymous wants to express himself, he is free to start his own blog.
In short, you hit the nail squarely on the head. BRAVO...!
There are however, other factors driving economic policy directly into the great abyss. Popular consensus manufactured by the the political and media establishment, favors a discredited economic model that advocates permagrowth with all it's warts and what we clearly see are cancerous lesions.
There is, in this writer's opinion, little doubt that the worst is yet to come. I'm seeking a tell, in order to hedge my economic well being. Perhaps the dollar or treasuries. Whatever it is, it will not be gradual. A sovereing systemic failure, will be fast, furious and catastrophic.
For me a "sovereign systemic failure" (debt defaulting) of a "big" country will precisely be the uber-turning point... If there is to be such a point in time where clearly the things fall apart and the process stops being continuous and becomes abrupt - (continuous as it has been until now).
Tiago said..."...For me a "sovereign systemic failure" (debt defaulting) of a "big" country will precisely be the uber-turning point."ReplyDelete
The final big country a sovereign default would apply to would be the US and there's a likely lesson here. From the recent run-up of $8 to $14 Trillion in additional guarantees, obligations, bailouts and loans, I realized the US will use spinning to ensure it's never said that the US defaulted.
What we will experience is an “Undeclared yet Defacto Sovereign Default” where new 'workable' terms are 'negotiated' or 'understood', ‘re-structuring undertaken’ mutually between parties of debtors and creditors.
I think China, the EuroZone, UK, Japan, IMF. WB, all understand this and similar treatment will be applied to these big boys.
The mainstream media will play along and only in blogdom will you see the words Sovereign Default.
You will be deprived of the ‘Screaming headlines’ thru obfuscation, financial alchemy, and sleight-of-hand just as we were over the past months as Bernanke/Geithner/Blair took the Bush/Paulson financial alchemy to even higher levels.
That is the unlearned lesson of “the Tipping Point’: that as long as people keep screaming that it a Tipping Point is approaching and what it looks like, etc, (as the wonking are want to do) the easier it is to diffuse the socio-cultural forces needed to ignite the Tipping Point by modifying words and perceptions.
"as the wonking" should have been typed as "wonk-ish".ReplyDelete
I'm gonna have to side with Avl Guy on this and encourage you to delete the comments of the anonymous racist. It tarnishes the character of the site as a whole.
ref.: impolitic commentsReplyDelete
My druthers would to be to accept all types of posted comments even the worst trash. Clusterstock - Henry Blodget's very popular business and politics site - - he was invited in on Obama's blog conference call on the stimulus plan - - does this. Every time someone with a swarthy demeanor like Roubini or Taleb is featured in an item the racists get on the comment thread in force.
What is the value of this. Well we give them a chance to identify themselves so we can know exactly what we are up against and to reply with what I feel is the only tool we have for constructive change, public reprobation.
Many people reply to their bursts of hatred and petti mindedness with outrage and I think it serves a purpose to let them know how unpopular and isolated they are, not to mention how stupid.. As Debra will tell you peer pressure is an enormous social force. It gives me a chance to tell how when I grew up "olive" not white skinned Italians were referred to as the n**gers of Europe and ask if we have been graduated and if so why?
This usually shuts them up. In fact I have noticed on the site a distinct decline in racist hate comments as they are routinely and overwhelmeningly denounced.
ref.: On Another SubjectReplyDelete
Please Google the following:
TechTicker - America in Terminal Decline? No Way, Says Geopolitical Expert George Friedman
for a very interesting counter-argument on America's decline. Some of his points are valid but I don't believe he takes into account the moral decline of the country and what that implies for or organizational ability and potential social chaos. Nevertheless, very interesting thesis.
You really have zeroed in on the problem here. I would only add that in previous recessions a "V-shaped" recovery would result from two things: expansion of credit (helped along by lower interest rates) and a resurgence in manufacturing. Of course, this time the expansion of credit is dampened by the inability of the Fed to effectively cut interest rates for consumers (yes, I know, mortgage rates have come down a whole percentage point for the best borrowers, big whoop-de-do..) but another part of the problem is that a service economy doesn't expand and contract as quickly as a manufacturing one (IMHO). So how precisely are things to get much better quickly? (To say nothing of the lost consumption of folks living off interest on their capital.)ReplyDelete
"This usually shuts them up. In fact I have noticed on the site a distinct decline in racist hate comments as they are routinely and overwhelmeningly denounced"ReplyDelete
I disagree; you can't reason with an entrenched personality disorder (often they enjoy the attention anyway). Deletion is the only effective remedy.
Re: comment moderationReplyDelete
I have in the past deleted comments when they crossed the line. This guy has, too, but I am leaving his comment on for one reason only: he claims that it takes $800,000 per year to live decently in the US.
This is such an astonishing statement that it deserves the infamy of publicity.
Leaving racists post alive on Sudden Debt does NOT shut them up.ReplyDelete
Nor does it ‘inform us’ of what racists are thinking.
Racists already have their own vast collection of web sites; if you have a personal need to check in on what they’re thinking, go to their websites and engage them there on their territory.
Blogger Yves Smith method is best; 1)remove their posts; 2) PUBLICLY denounce them as the web 'authority figure' for the blog; and 3) warn them that a ban is possible if they continue to offend. Her #1 offers a punitive response that exceeds the comforting fairytale of ‘peer pressure’.
For those what want to explore a peer pressure experiment, please go to the many racists sites on the web, register as a member, and wage a battle on their web home.
You can report back to us.
There is a Slippery Slope from Intellectual Curiosity to Tolerance to Cowardice, folks.
Hell you always have the option to memorialize that quote that so intrigues you and memorializing the source by referencing him; nonetheless that derogatory slander creates a stench that only spreads deeper into the fabric of your blogsite.ReplyDelete
You always have the option to surf other sites of stupidity and provide links to idiocy posted there. You have options.
At this point, such rationale is raising questions about the size of one’s 'blind spot' to racism and questions on whether one too easily pursues 'intrigue' as a fair exchange for exhibiting a serious insensitivity to Black people, Mexican naturals and immigrants, and others.
Again....very slippery slopes.
And growing blindspots?
@ Avi GuyReplyDelete
"There is a Slippery Slope from Intellectual Curiosity to Tolerance to Cowardice, folks."
Where did you get this from? Have you actually dealt with the racism on Clusterstock or denounced Anonymous to any extent here?
I do respect Hell's decision on this and understand it well. But having been denounced as "olive" skinned for a third of my 60 years here only because my last name ends in a vowel I can say for myself I would rather have someone upfront in his hatred than behind my back. The best of course would be to have no hatred at all.
You protest too much Avi. One absurdity that came up on the clusterstock site was jews denouncing Arabs as expletive anti-semites. I was able to point out that they are both Semites and seemingly quiet the furor. The person apparently didn't know that and was treating Arabs as an expletive race. Even today's discussion seem to have some benefit in Hell's pointing out that civility is not elitism. No the point is not rational arguments as much as shaming and peer pressure which you obviously could not do by visiting a racist site where they all congregate.
So while I respect any decision that Hell makes on this delicate matter, one wouldn't want the site overrun or distracted after all, I do think some of you are suspicously sensitive on the subject.
@ Anonymous SS wroteReplyDelete
"@ Avi Guy
...Have you actually dealt with the racism on Clusterstock or denounced Anonymous to any extent here?"
SS, any other site, ur preferred Clusterstock included, is completely irrelevant to what I posted. I don’t care who or what goes on within those sites...if you do, then fine, indulge urself, fella.
You are super-imposing ur ‘Olive Skin’ issues and another web site's issues atop my comments. My comments are strictly about this site and only this site.
And finally, what, pray tell, is the distinction you see between being "sensitive" versus being "suspiciously sensitive"?
If u respond at all...please pontificate on the distinction you see and the merits it contains.
Let me be blunt...
”WHAT is your suspicion?”
My suspicion is that you may be latently racist - - to some extent we all are - - and so much so to be afraid to acknowledge it and deal with it head on in others. I really hope that this is not the case and have no idea more than a suspicion since I don't know you. Racism is out there and must be dealt with. I do acknowledge though that shutting it off the site is one way of dealing with it and sometimes the best.
Personally I thought that the poster this morning could be acknowledged and challenged as an individual. Doing that every time a nasty comment comes up is admittedly another question but not as shut and dried as your anger would suggest.
First time contributor, long time commenter here.... AVL, who made you the cyber-police? You know, it's ironic that before I opened the blog today, I was thinking to myself, "Let me post a comment and just thank this guy for everything he's done." It's such an informative and well written blog, it's truly a second education to read this every day, or every other day. So many great points seem so effortlessly communicated about 5 times a week.
So that said, yes I feel as well that racism is a gross reality we face. However it's Hell's blog. He stated his reply, leave it at that. You don't have to read this, just like you don't have to gratify someone's negativity with this ongoing crusade of yours. I don't see you writing information like this, and that's because I have no desire to, because frankly, you're annoying and seem completely ungrateful (grateful dead spelling intended). I am not the same poster as the racist, by the way.
Another excellent post hellasious. Precise and clearly written. We truly are facing the end of era, yet so many people simply ignore or can't grasp this fact, until it hits them in the face I suppose. We are in the process of reverting to the tried but true economic principles of always.ReplyDelete
Edit to my last post: I am a first time contributor, long time reader.ReplyDelete
AVL, otherwise, thank you for advancing the discussion. One day I hope to be able to contribute on this level.
Dearest, you've been in France too long and, alas, we now all understand why, that is until your comment is summarily deleted from the thread; way worse than racism here you talked about sex!! And a female expressing sexual thoughts and feelings not to mention "actions, " bad. So goodbye, dear Debra, farewell, Aurevoir mon chou - - my cabbage - a common French expression - - just so I don't get tagged by the site police.
Yet another example of how solutions to the tragedy of the commons always create their own problems.ReplyDelete
For better AND worse, we have to admit this blog is a complex system.
My own sympathy leans with Avl and Dink- I truly find this stuff disgusting. And yet I strongly sympathize with SS's bent towards public humiliation and I too have a strong anti censorship bias.
Further the selfish side of me truly hates the idea that Hell spends ANY time dealing with spam/hate speech/etc... seems such a waste where it distracts him from posts/comments, etc... I do realize he has a non-blog life.
But "we have to choose sides" and in the end we do have to live by rules and "civility" does seem a good one.
So if readers' comments have any sway on you Hell, I vote you throw the bum off the island, this stuff crosses the line imo. But if this stuff is taking much time, I hope you will let us know and we can come up with a collective solution.
@Andrew- Welcome :-)
@Deb- I think I will avoid guessing for obvious reasons :-)
@SS- Play nice. Context is everything and we all know it.
Chou a Lacanian conundrum -ReplyDelete
What is a "chou", someone you like but nobody really likes cabbage? So "chou" is the perfect Lacanian conundrum, an expression commonly used but without "affect" without "signifiant."
As big a puzzle for Lacanians as "Unified Field Theory" was for Einstein and that's a mouth-full.
Science bloggers to the rescue - millions of Frenchman call their dearest "chou" but no one really likes cabbage; and we all circulate through the universe but unified field theory is ripe with contradictions. I'm totally lost!
AVL- I have black cousins...we get the point that you don't like was said. We're here to read Hell though and those who contribute to the discussion. Best part about this country is the right to free speech and Hell's interpretation of it via "passivity". (Also, look at his name. Do you get any implication of hand-holding from it? I didn't.)ReplyDelete
Thai- been an admirer of your thoughts as well. Thanks for the welcome!
As not to be hypocritical, I'll only be back when I can contribute to the topic.
Hell thanks again.
"... I'll only be back when I can contribute to the topic."ReplyDelete
For to quote T.S. Elliot
Jellicle Cats come out to-night
Jellicle Cats come one come all:
The Jellicle Moon is shining bright -
Jellicles come to the Jellicle Ball.
Jellicle Cats are black and white,
Jellicle Cats are rather small;
Jellicle Cats are merry and bright,
And pleasant to hear when they caterwaul.
Jellicle Cats have cheerful faces,
Jellicle Cats have bright black eyes;
They like to practise their airs and graces
And wait for the Jellicle Moon to rise.
Jellicle Cats develop slowly,
Jellicle Cats are not too big;
Jellicle Cats are roly-poly,
They know how to dance a gavotte and a jig.
Until the Jellicle Moon appears
They make their toilette and take their repose:
Jellicle Cats wash behind their ears,
Jellicle dry between their toes.
Jellicle Cats are white and black,
Jellicle Cats are of moderate size;
Jellicle Cats jump like a jumping-jack,
Jellicle Cats have moonlit eyes.
They're quitet enough in the morning hours,
They're quitet enough in the afternoon,
Reserving their terpsichorean powers
To dance by the light of the Jellicle Moon.
Jellicle Cats are black and white,
Jellicle Cats (as I said) are small;
If it happends to be a stormy night
They will practise a caper or two in the hall.
If it happens the sun is shining bright
You would say they had nothing to do at all:
They are resting and saving themselves to be right
For the Jellicle Moon and the Jellicle Ball.
I vote we let Hell retain his position as CEO of Hell's Blog.ReplyDelete
Avl Guy: If you hold zero tolerance dogmatic positions on anything the terrorists win.
"(Jellicle Cats)Reserving their terpsichorean powers
To dance by the light of the Jellicle Moon."
Shhh France is sleeping!
Listening to Obama today I was thinking of McCain, I am so f'ing glad that Ann-Randian WWIII pyscho bomb Iran and send another Trillion dollars on bombs retard did not get elected.ReplyDelete
Thank God America Woke Up!
what if there is not crisis part 2?ReplyDelete
Just some minor long term inflation and some uber rich scumbags getting taxed back into the middle class.
I for one will never vote Republican again unless a Ron Paul take over the party.
Republicans have become pure fascists, whatever that means.
To the LAST anonymous who just posted, well...ReplyDelete
FRANCE just woke up and doesn't particularly appreciate the usurpation of her PROVOCATIONS on this blog.
We have now WASTED mucho time and energy on this silliness.
SS, I am impressed when you flex your Lacanian muscles...
Thai, is that REALLY T.S. Eliot ?
I'm going to have to reread...
Shucks, you guys almost made me late for my piano lesson this morning, wading through all the (off-topic) comments...
Avl Guy said...ReplyDelete
Hell, WHY is this needlessly racist vomit still allowed to appear here in your blog?
Quit Whining already:
"Racist" these days means "anything that (might) offend anyone (soemwhere)" and the decision is not made by the potentially offended part either!!
We got enough yapping from the EU and the UN already!!
The world economy has not yet emerged from the crisis, but the worst has been left behind.ReplyDelete